COMPARISON OF TRIGGER POINT THERAPY AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL THERAPY IN TENSION TYPE HEADACHES

soi: 21-2017/re-trjvol03iss01p99

  • Saima Aslam Isra Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences, Isra University Islamabad
  • Aqeel Ahmed Isra Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences, Isra University Islamabad
  • Sundas Zia Isra Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences, Isra University Islamabad
  • Noureen Farooq Isra Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences, Isra University Islamabad

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of trigger point release and conventional physical therapy in tension type headaches.Methodology: Randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted from 18th February 2017 to 13 July 2018, Physical therapy Department of IIRS Isra University, Islamabad Campus, Pakistan. A total of n=31 healthy individuals with tension type headache below the age of 50 years, were selected randomly from ISRA university .The participants were divided into conventional physical therapy group and trigger point therapy group. The conventional physical therapy group was given traditional physical therapy, while trigger point therapy group was given trigger point therapy. Three sessions of trigger point release and conventional physical therapy was given to trigger point therapy group and conventional physical therapy group respectively on alternate days. Pain and Headache disability index data was compared at baseline and during and after the intervention while quality of life was measured pre and post the sessions. For within the groups changes RM-ANOVA was used and for between the groups differences independent sample t-test was used. Results: The results showed that pain was significantly reduced at the end of intervention in conventional physical therapy group as compare to trigger point therapy group (1.31±0.47 ver. 2.13±0.64, p<0.001). Regarding headache disability index, at the end of intervention trigger point therapy group show better results as compare to conventional physical therapy group (32.75±12.83 ver. 53.27±26.57, p=0.01). While comparing quality of life between the groups, no significant difference was observed after intervention. Conclusion: It was concluded that both conventional physical therapy and trigger point therapy are effective in the management of tension type headache. It decreased pain and disability caused by headache but no effect on quality of life due to shorter duration of study. However, there is still no evidence as to which techniques should be used. In this context, one should emphasize on conducting comparative studies with larger sample and duration to established evidence based facts.

Author Biographies

Saima Aslam, Isra Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences, Isra University Islamabad

Senior Lecturer

Aqeel Ahmed, Isra Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences, Isra University Islamabad

Assistant Professor

Sundas Zia, Isra Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences, Isra University Islamabad

Assistant Professor

Noureen Farooq, Isra Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences, Isra University Islamabad

Assistant Professor

Published
2019-06-30
How to Cite
ASLAM, Saima et al. COMPARISON OF TRIGGER POINT THERAPY AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL THERAPY IN TENSION TYPE HEADACHES. The Rehabilitation Journal, [S.l.], v. 3, n. 1, p. 99-104, june 2019. ISSN 2521-3458. Available at: <http://trjournal.org/index.php/TRJ/article/view/23>. Date accessed: 22 nov. 2019.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.